Wednesday, February 29, 2012

Shrake to Office of the Attorney General

Ward Shrake

October 1, 2011

Office of the Attorney General
State ofNew Mexico; Paul Bardacke Complex
P.O. Drawer 1508
Santa Fe, NM 87504-1508

Dear Attorney General:

      Roughly a week ago I wrote to your offices, hoping to have you folks enforce the
"Inspection of Public Records Act," in regards to the city of Raton. My earlier letter came
to you before the statute of limitations or the deadline had actually run out (on my written
request to Raton's records custodian; which they had received and signed for, on the
15th of September) - but now, the 15 calendar days that Raton had to either get me the records
I had asked for, or the proper type of written denials that IPRA laws call for, has passed.

     I'm hoping that you'll follow up on that matter, now, with the city of Raton.

Source: http://www.nmag.gov/pdf/Ward%20Shrake%20IPRA%20complaint%20City%20of%20Raton%5B1%5D.pdf

Rerecich/Engel to NM Attorney General

John Rerecich/Kathryn Engel

December 12,2011

NM Attorney General
Civil Division
P0 Drawer 1508
Santa Fe, NM 87504

Specific dates of potential violation

According to the City Mayor, Neil Segotta there was a meeting held on Dec 11, 2011, for the purpose of creating a Resolution that would restrict a Commissior [sic] from consulting with the City Attorney, or to undermine the majority by contacting other governmental agencies; or non-govermental [sic] agencies; in any official capacity.

Description of the public body that took the action in Question

The public body that took this action was certain members of the Raton City Commission together with the City Manager, Jeff Condrey. Commissioner Sandy Mantz was not informed of this meeting or its purpose. Others not informed were the citizens of Raton and the meeting was held in private. The other Commissioner not informed of the meeting was Chris Candelario. The Mayor, Neil Segotta, and the two remaining Commissioners who were involved were Charles Starkovich and Sarah Montoya, an Attorney At Law.

Description of specific circumstances surrounding the Allegation

The only elected Commissioner is Sandy Mantz who has been referred by the three aforementioned Commissioners as a rogue Commissioner, because she consults with her constituents and advises the Commission on financial matters as she is an accountant. She has been voted against by the three mentioned above, who are appointed Commissioners, on most issues brought before the Commission.

The most recent conflict has been the Commisssion [sic] decision to utilize Lodger's Tax money to pay for an economic impact study requested by a priviate [sic] developer. When it was pointed out to them by Commissioner Mantz that it was illegal use of the Lodgers Tax funds, they called for the vote and again voted

1

it in, saying they were going to do it anyway. Commissioner Mantz consulted with the Municipal League, the City Attorney and the DFA who all supported her position. This was the final straw and the incident that drove the City Manager, the Mayor and the remaining Commissioners, excepting Chris Candelario, into this desparate [sic] move.

Other supporting documentation

Supporting documentation is a copy of the Resolution in question which was drafted without an OPEN MEETING or even a special closed meeting. It was released publicly on Monday Dec. 12 as already approved and dated Dec 13, 2011. It was voted on at the Commission Meeting Dec 13. I have also included a a [sic] statement made by myself during the "items from citizens present" at the end of the meeting.

In conclusion, if this move was initiated by the City Manager alone, it is clearly inappropriate and beyond his authority. If it was directed by one or more of the Commissioners, it is clearly a violation of the Open Meeting Law. Thank you for your consideration,

Kathryn Engel and John Rerecich

2

Sunday, February 5, 2012

"Thank You" Letter from MCMC to NM Land Commissioner

 November 4, 2011

Commissioner Ray Powell
New Mexico State Land Office
310 Old Santa Fe Trail
Santa Fe, NM 87501

Dear Commissioner Powell,

New Mexico is a state rich in history and culture. Since New Mexico was a Territory, state lands have been granted for the operation and maintenance of the Miners’ Hospital. For the past 105 years, Miners’ Hospital has never closed it’s [sic] doors. This fact is a tribute and testimonial to our Forefathers, and individuals such as yourself, that have made the best decisions possible to ensure that our miners have had a facility available to them "for the treatment and care of resident miners who may become sick or injured in the line of their occupation".

The State Land Office has fulfilled their commitment to the Miners’ Hospital since it’s [sic] inception. The funds that are entrusted to the Miners’ Hospital are critical to it’s [sic] ability to sustain services to our resident miners and general public. The funds account for approximately 25% of the Hospital’s annual revenue. In 1987, Miner’s [sic] Hospital and Colfax County merged to create the Miners’ Colfax Medical Center (MCMC). MCMC has since been providing treatment and care for most of the northeastern population and is proud to continue this great tradition.

I want to commend and thank you for the job that you do. MCMC and the other beneficiaries owe their existence and ability to remain available to the citizens of New Mexico to individuals such as yourself.

Respectfully,

Thomas Poteste
Chief Financial Officer

Source: http://www.nmstatelands.org/uploads/files/Land%20Commissioner%20Letter%283%29.pdf

In Search of MCMC Financial Report

I have searched in vain for a posting of the Miners' Colfax Medical Center annual financial report.  I can find a picture of Britney Spear's naked hoo-ha and Justin Bieber's helmet hair, but I can't find this report.  Why is that?

Anyways, I did find this link: http://www.nmstatelands.org/Miners_Colfax_Medical_Center.aspx

which reports:

"This beneficiary (MCMC) received more than $2.3 million in income from state trust land revenue in fiscal year 2011."

So, regardless of whether MCMC has its own trust fund, it definitely received state money.  Some would argue that it's not "tax" money, but any money spent by the state on one endeavor means money from some other source (your taxes) must be spent on something that would have been covered by that money.  It all comes from the same pot.